Editorial standards

The Arisn Journal publishes practical guides for people changing their relationship with porn, urges, and daily routines. These standards explain how we identify authors, handle sources, and correct the record.

Authorship

Every article has a byline that links to its author page. David and Andrew are distinct writers who use pen names. Their author pages list the articles credited to them.

Sources and claims

Articles link to primary research, systematic reviews, or other authoritative sources when they discuss research findings. We distinguish evidence from practical suggestions and personal reports. A cited source supports the specific claim beside it, rather than a broad promise about what an app or a streak can achieve.

We avoid presenting a fixed recovery timetable, a streak, or an app feature as proof of a medical outcome. Arisn is a self-improvement and habit-tracking tool. It does not diagnose, treat, or cure a condition.

Updates and corrections

We update articles when a material factual point needs correction or clearer context. The publication and modified dates in article metadata identify the version that search systems can read. Readers can report a correction through support@arisn.app.

Editorial independence

Product pages and guides identify Arisn as the publisher. When a guide compares products or explains a third-party term, it states any relevant independence or trademark context. We do not sell editorial rankings or claim an affiliation we do not have.

For questions, corrections, or partnership enquiries: support@arisn.app